Hi!

There has been a flurry of activity in recent months to addresses IESG feedback 
from on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis.  A big thank you to Rich Salz for so many 
of the pull requests; Rob Stradling for staying on as the active author/editor; 
Andrew Ayer, Rasmus Dahlberg, Paul Wouters, Melinda Shore, Ryan Sleevi, and 
Russ Housley for bringing renewed energy needed to close this document.

Given the new content, that so much time has passed since the original IETF 
Last Call/IESG review, and that most IESG ballots have timed out, we'll need to 
rerun the consensus process.  Since there is now momentum and the IESG feedback 
appears addressed, I am going to return the document back for a short trip back 
through the WG.  Next:

(1) I'd ask that a new version of the document (-36) be published based on all 
of the merged content currently in github 
(https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/blob/master/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis.md)
 so we can all look at the totality of the updates.  From there, the chairs 
(thanks Melinda and Paul!) can ensure that the WG can raise any final 
objections (i.e., a WGLC) on the changes.

(2) When ready, I'll bring it back for a second IETF Last Call and back through 
the IESG.

Again, a big thanks for this rally to complete this work.

Roman


_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to