On 9/4/23 8:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
Of course, it never hurts to write it up in a draft and see if people
get interested. Possible ways to publish an RFC from that are to re-open
the trans WG (via a new BoF) or if this is deemed a one-off, perhaps the
route of AD Sponsor would be possible. A third way, which I think makes
less sense, is publication in the Independent Stream (ISE). But since
9162 is Experimental, that could be done.

Note that there are several other transparency efforts ramping up,
as well as (I think) other applications of Merkle trees within the
IETF where these papers may be relevant.  I think I'd bring these
to the attention of saag and possibly secdispatch to see if this
work can have broader purchase than limiting it to certificate
transparency.

Interesting papers; thanks for sending them along.

Melinda

[also hotrfc, if you'll be in Prague]

--
Melinda Shore
[email protected]

Software longa, hardware brevis

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to