The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9162, "Certificate Transparency Version 2.0".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8670 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Niels Möller <[email protected]> Section: 2.1.3.2 Original Text ------------- ii. If LSB(fn) is not set, then right-shift both fn and sn equally until either LSB(fn) is set or fn is 0. Corrected Text -------------- ii. If LSB(fn) is not set, then right-shift both fn and sn equally until LSB(fn) is set. Notes ----- This even case can happen only when fn == sn > 0, which means that the shifting loop always terminates with fn odd (and hence non-zero). Suggesting that fn == 0 can happen is confusing, since in this case the preceding update of r, using a path element as *left* sibling, makes no sense. Not sure if it would be helpful to also add a comment explaining why the loop terminates. The same correction applies to 2.1.4.2, algorithm step 6.b.iii. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC9162 (draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-42) -------------------------------------- Title : Certificate Transparency Version 2.0 Publication Date : December 2021 Author(s) : B. Laurie, E. Messeri, R. Stradling Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Public Notary Transparency Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
