Hi Shelly,
Have you considered tying the rendering physician to the charge detail?


-----Original Message-----
From: Barton, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:24 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: 837 Professional - Rendering provider information


Shelly,
Doing this may dramatically increase the size of you transaction files.
Maybe an alternative option, would be to build another table for HIPAA
service line rendering provider. Instead of drawing your provider from your
current data element location, draw it from the new table, based of course
on the origin of the transaction - 837 or paper etc.
Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: Prabhakaran, Shell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 837 Professional - Rendering provider information


I have a question about rendering provider that I could use help with. 

        We develop a product that is used by payers. Our current database
model maps to the historical HCFA form where there is a single
rendering/servicing provider per claim. The 837 has the ability to specify a
different rendering provider per detail/service line level. This would be a
considerable change to our system. We are thinking of splitting such
transaction into two (or more) separate claims. Is this legal? Does anyone
have any insight? How are others handling this?

Thanks,

--------------------------------
Shelley A. Prabhakaran
Developer, B1-MCO
2840 Mt. Wilkinson Pkwy
Atlanta, GA     30339
(770) 444-5034




**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.




**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.


**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.

Reply via email to