Connie, If the incoming transactions contains X12 standards syntax errors it must be rejected. The correct way to report this rejection is via the 997 Functional Acknowledgment transaction.
Rachel Foerster Principal Rachel Foerster & Associates, Ltd. Professionals in EDI & Electronic Commerce 39432 North Avenue Beach Park, IL 60099 Phone: 847-872-8070 Fax: 847-872-6860 http:/www.rfa-edi.com -----Original Message----- From: Connie Lagneaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:06 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: questions on the appropriate way to reply when there are errors in a transaction request 1. If there are actual syntax errors in an incoming X12, what exactly is the correct way to respond? By this I mean it is not a valid X12 at all. We are unclear as to whether it is appropriate to respond with a 997 vs something, for example, in a 271 or 277). 2. If there are "logical" errors in an incoming X12, what exactly is the correct response? By this I mean it is a valid X12 but it does not meet the HiPAA specs. Examples: If 276 - IG 54, 98 - is not set to the code "PR" for payor but to something else, what do we do? (if we would be receiving requests only from payors) A 997 response? If 276 - IG 67, 98 - is not set to "1P" for provider but to something else, what do we do? (if we are only expecting 1P) A 997? 3. If there are "business" errors in an incoming X12, what exactly is our response? By this I mean that the request is both a valid X12 and a valid HIPAA transaction but contains other errors. Examples would be an unknown information source (payor), and unknown provider, etc. Also I think this would include issues like the dependent given is not a dependent of the given subscriber. It appears that each level of a 271 has request validation segments / reject reason codes in the 270 request. Are these codes used for business errors while a 997 is used for other errors? Since the 277 lacks these codes, are all errors handled using 997s? If so doesn't this stop all further processing of the 276 transactions in the transmissions? <<...OLE_Obj...>> Connie Lagneaux, RN, BSN, MBA Senior Business Analyst 5151 E. Broadway Boulevard, suite 1050 Tucson, AZ 85711 Phone (520) 571-1988 ext. 153 Fax (520) 571-1927 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. ====================================================== The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically prohibited. ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. ====================================================== The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically prohibited.
