Help my organization be
clear the issue of the 271 Unsolicited roster.
The
regulations mandate the 270/271 request/response pair, not the unsolicited
roster
Subpart L—Eligibility for a Health Plan § 162.1201 Eligibility for a health plan transaction. The eligibility for a health plan transaction is the transmission of either of the following: (a) An inquiry from a health
care provider to a health plan, or from
one health plan to another health plan,
to obtain any of the following
information about a benefit plan for an
enrollee:
(1)
Eligibility to receive health care under
the health plan.
(2) Coverage of health care
under the health plan.
(3)
Benefits associated with the benefit
plan.
(b) A response from a health plan to a health care provider’s (or another health plan’s) inquiry described in paragraph (a) of this section. § 162.1202 Standards for eligibility for a health plan.The Secretary adopts the following standards for the eligibility for a health plan transaction: ... (b) Dental, professional, and institutional. The ASC X12N 270/271– Health Care Eligibility Benefit Inquiry and Response, Version 4010, May 2000, Washington Publishing Company, 004010X092. The implementation specification is available at the addresses specified in § 162.920(a)(1). So.... am I correct in assuming that even if the 271 Roster is finalized,
the HIPAA standards for transactions will still have to be
revised to require the roster as a mandated standard? (Not that using the
271 roster isn't a good idea...)
In other words, once the
guide has passed the final proofing phase and is published does not infer a
change in the mandated transactions? Are we interpreting this
correctly?
thanks,
Kris Owens
Senior IS Project Manager - HIPAA Project 505.923.8108 "You don't know what you can get away with until you try" General Colin Powell
********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. ===================================================== The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically prohibited.
|
Title: 271 Unsolicited
- 271 Unsolicited Grant, Dana
- Re: 271 Unsolicited Lisa Amerino-Marshalko
- RE: 271 Unsolicited Stuart Beaton
- RE: 271 Unsolicited gloria.harris
- RE: 271 Unsolicited Owens, Kris
- RE: 271 Unsolicited Stuart Beaton
