YIKES!! I had no idea that the 2440 loop ("additional supporting
information") was not in the underlying X12 standard. Vision is "eyeing"
(excuse the pun) this loop to provide additional identifying information
about eyewear products. (perhaps this explains some of the controversy
around this useful-looking part of the claim)
-Chris
At 10:11 AM 4/22/02 -0400, William J. Kammerer wrote:
>Hey! I have one for you all! Take a look at the 837 Professional IG
>(004010X098) - it uses a loop (2440) at the end of the transaction which
>IS NOT in the underlying 004010 standard! What would you do in this
>case? Send back a negative 997 indicating an X12 syntax error if the
>2440 loop were actually used? See if you can make hay with that!!
Christopher J. Feahr, OD
http://visiondatastandard.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell/Pager: 707-529-2268
**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.
======================================================
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions
on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do
not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If
you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues
Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically
prohibited.
