>>> "Kumar Sivaraman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/22/02 02:01PM >>>
Hi All,
On the subject of HIPAA code
sets I wish to request your comments on the
following.
Problem
statement
-----------------
HIPAA mandates that in order for a
transaction to be HIPAA-compliant, the
value of certain data items must be
validated to be contained in an instance
of a code set that was "valid
within the dates specified by the organization
responsible for maintaining
that code set".
An "instance" of a code set contains the set of all
valid values for a
specific data item at a specific point in time - for
example, the set of all
valid zip codes for the US as at 1-Jan-2000 is
contained in the code set
instance published by the issuing authority for
zip codes with an applicable
date of 1-Jan-2000.
The authorized
issuing authority for a specific code set is responsible for
making new
instances of that code set available to parties which require to
validate
against that code set.
There is necessarily a delay between the actual
publication date of a new
instance of a code set, and the installation of
that code set instance on a
specific computer system ready for use
validating transaction data values.
This gives rise to the likelihood
of the following problem occurring
regularly in operational
systems:
1. A transaction set is originated in trading partner A
(TP-A).
2. A data value in that transaction set is validated by TP-A
to be correct,
as it is contained in the current code set instance in use
by that trading
partner.
3. TP-A transmits the transaction set to
TP-B.
4. TP-B validates the same data value, which fails validation
because a
different code set instance is in use by
TP-B.
Questions
---------
a) How does the healthcare industry
address this issue?
b) Do code set issuing authority indicate any time
frame by which a new code
set (or a new value in a code set) becomes
effective and ready for use in
transactions?
c) The magnitude of this
is much bigger for clearinghouses. How would they
address
this?
Thanks,
Kumar Sivaraman
Business Analyst -
Standards
SeeBeyond Technology Corp.
|-----Original
Message-----
|From: Dhandapani, Palani (Cognizant) [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]|Sent:
Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:06 AM
|To: Winston, Mike K.; Dhandapani, Palani
(Cognizant);
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
|Subject: RE:
Date of service
|
|
|Interesting.
|
|Coming to claims that are
already in the system/application
|prior to HIPAA
|switch being turned
on, we may not be able to apply HIPAA edits for two
|reasons : 1. Claims
may have non standard code sets that may not pass
|Level-5 HIPAA edits
(code set validation) 2. The claim may be
|have come in
|the
non-standard format, so there is no need to apply Level-1
|to
Level-6
|edits. Folks, please correct me if I am wrong.
|
|Now, I
have one question to the Group:
|
|What are the different scenarios for
processing claims after
|Oct 2003? I
|have listed here some of them.
Please add if I have missed
|anything or if I
|am
wrong.
|
|Scenario-1 : Claims with standard code sets in X12 4010
format
|
|Option : No problem as the HIPAA compliant application will be
able to
|handle it happily.
|
|Scenario-2 : Claims with Standard
codes in Paper format
|
|Option-1: Accept, adjudicate and send Paper
EOB. Only Level-5
|HIPAA Edit in
|the application.
|Option-2: Send
835 ERA, if provider requests. (Make sure all minimum
|required
information is available for generating 835 as
|response to
Paper
|claim). Level-5 edit in the application and other HIPAA edits
|for 835 at the
|outbound side.
|
|Scenario-3 : Claims with
non-standard codes in Paper format.
|
|Option-1: Accept, cross walk,
adjudicate and send paper EOB.
|Option-2: Notify providers to stop sending
claims with
|non-standard codes
|from a cut-off date prior to HIPAA
compliance date.
|
|Am I missing anything
?
|
|Thanks
|Palani
|Cognizant Technology
Solutions
|201-678-2772
|
|-----Original Message-----
|From:
Winston, Mike K. [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]|Sent:
Tuesday, May 21, 2002 7:46 AM
|To: 'Dhandapani, Palani (Cognizant)';
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
|'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
|Subject: RE: Date of
service
|
|
|Thanks,
| I do not see how Hipaa can expect edits to
be applied to a
|claim adjustment
|when the original claim was
processed before the edits were
|established.
|Does Claim generation
refer to the date the claim was generated by the
|provider, if so then
claims already in our system prior to the
|Hipaa switch
|being turned
on do not have to meet the Hipaa edits. Correct?
|
|
|Mike
Winston
|Business Systems Analyst
|Trigon ISD
|Ph (804)
354-4521
|Fx (804) 678-0452
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|This message,
including files attached to it, may contain confidential
|information that
is intended only for the use of the ADDRESSEE(S) named
|above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
|notified that
|any
dissemination or copying of the information is strictly
|prohibited.
If
|you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender
|immediately and delete the message from your system. Thank
you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|> -----Original
Message-----
|> From: Dhandapani, Palani (Cognizant)
|[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|> Sent: Tuesday,
May 21, 2002 10:15 AM
|> To: Winston, Mike K.;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
|> Subject:
RE: Date of service
|>
|> There are two components here. Medical
code sets and
|NonMedical code sets.
|>
|> For Non-medical
code sets, the Data of service is the
|reference. So we
|> should
use the medical codes that are valid on the date of service.
|>
|> For Non-medical code sets, the date of Claim generation is
|the
reference.
|>
|> Please refer to the following
regulation:
|>
|> 162.1000
|>
|> (a) Medical data
code sets: Use the applicable medical data code sets
|> described in
section 162.1002 as specified in the implementation
|> specification
adopted under this part that are valid at the time the
|>
health
|> care is furnished.
|>
|> (b) NonMedical data code
sets: Use the non medical data code sets as
|> described in the
implementation specifications adopted under
|this part
|>
that
|> are valid at the time the transaction is initiated.
|>
|> Hope this helps.
|>
|> Thanks
|> Palani
|>
Cognizant Technology Solutions
|> 201-678-2772
|>
|>
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: Winston, Mike K. [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]|>
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 6:37 AM
|> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
|> Subject: Date of service
|>
|>
|> I know this was discussed, but I want to confirm that
|opinions
have not
|> changed. When Hipaa is in effect we are planning on using
|the claims Date
|> of
|> Service to determine if the claim
needs to be fully compliant or not,
|> example: Claim was
submitted prior to Hipaa live date with
|a "Homegrown
|> code" the
835 goes out after Hipaa is implemented with the
|non-compliant
|>
code. or Claims that were not subject to any crossfoot edits prior to
|>
hipaa
|> if adjusted will be sent out on the 835 but will not
crossfoot.
|>
|> We are making the logic based on the claims date
of service not the
|> processed date. Any thoughts?
|>
|>
Mike Winston
|> Business Systems Analyst
|> Trigon ISD
|> Ph
(804) 354-4521
|> Fx (804) 678-0452
|>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>
|> This message, including files attached
to it, may contain
|confidential
|> information that is intended
only for the use of the
|ADDRESSEE(S) named
|> above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are
|hereby notified
|>
that
|> any dissemination or copying of the information is strictly
|prohibited.
|> If
|> you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender
|> immediately and delete the message from your
system. Thank you.
|>
|>
|>
|>
|>
|> << File: InterScan_Disclaimer.txt >>
|
To be removed from this list, go to:
http://snip.wedi.org/unsubscribe.cfm?list=businessand
enter your email address.
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are
subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore
represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily
represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you
wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP
Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.Posting
of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically
prohibited.