It's in the appendices of each of the IG's. In the 834 IG, it's on page B.11
-----Original Message----- From: Martin Scholl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:36 PM To: Hal Scoggins; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Transaction acknowledgments 997 Hal, Thanks for clarifying this. Where do I find an IG on the TA1? Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hal Scoggins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:09 AM Subject: RE: Transaction acknowledgments 997 > The ISA14 refers to the Interchange Acknowledgment (TA1). The 997 is a > Functional Acknowledgment. Every EDI transaction that is received should be > responded to with a 997. If the sender doesn't want it, the they can simply > ignore and/or delete it. However, since it contains information about > whether or not the transaction they sent was accepted in its entirety, they > would be wise to utilize it, IMO. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Scholl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Transaction acknowledgments 997 > > > It is my interpretation that a "1" in element 14 of the ISA segment > indicates whether the sender wants to receive an acknowledgement. This > should be the case for any EDI message, not only healthcare. > > Martin Scholl > Scholl Consulting Group, Inc. > 301-924-5537 Tel > 301-570-0139 Fax > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.SchollConsulting.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wojnowski, Charlotte M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:21 PM > Subject: Transaction acknowledgments 997 > > > > After reading the 834 IG, I received the impression that an 997 is > required > > to respond to the 834. Is this a correct statement? Is the sender > required > > to receive the 997? If this is the case with the 834, are the other > > transactions also set up the same way? > > > > Charlotte Wojnowski > > Caremark > > 847-444-6065 > > > >
