"U" is allowed.  see IG 837P,  page 116
Martin

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher J. Feahr, OD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hope Furtado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:23 PM
Subject: RE: Trading Partner/code values question


> Hope,
> It's very possible that I'm confused on this, but your example appears to
> be one of what is *not* permitted.  I.e., if "U" is part of the standard
> codeset, then it would have to be accepted.  I was under the impression
> that a "companion guide" or "TPA" could list the codes normally used (as a
> kind of "serving suggestion") but could not require *only* that subset be
> used, rejecting transactions that contained other valid codes... such as
> the "U" in your example.
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
> At 08:48 AM 6/4/02 -0400, Hope Furtado wrote:
> >A simple example would be Sex Code which under HIPAA allows for the
> >following codes:
> >
> >    M - for Male
> >    F -  for Female
> >    U -  for Unknown
> >
> >A Payor or Provider cannot require that an organization only send "F" or
> >"M", thus not accepting "U" based on an agreement outside the standards
of
> >HIPAA.
> >
> >Please feel free to contact me if you still have any questions or
concerns.
> >
> >Hope
> >
> >Hope Furtado
> >Corporate Information Architect
> >TM Floyd & Company, Inc.
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >(800)780-1170 extension 129
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mimi Hart [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:24 PM
> > > To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject:      Trading Partner/code values question
> > >
> > > I apologize up front if this is the wrong set to send this question
to:
> > >
> > > I have read and reread the Wedi Trading Partner White Paper and I am
> > > still struggling with the following:
> > >
> > > "informational subsets of valid code values that are used in any of
the
> > > receiver's systems or business processes" are okay...
> > >
> > > but
> > >
> > > "explicit requirements to only submit certain code values which are a
> > > subset of the values permitted in the IGs" are not...
> > >
> > > can someone help me get this straight? another example perhaps? Thanks
> > > MIMI
> > >
> > > Mimi Hart
> > > Research Analyst, HIPAA
> > > Iowa Health System
> > > 319-369-7767 (phone)
> > > 319-369-8365 (fax)
> > > 319-490-0637 (pager)
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Christopher J. Feahr, OD
> http://visiondatastandard.org
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cell/Pager: 707-529-2268
>

Reply via email to