|
Lisa,
The
client I am working for also offers a DDE application for
authorizations(278). We are going through the same process of rewriting
the 278 application. Here are some responses to your questions based on
our current understanding.
1. You should take a look at the draft for the 274
transaction. In the future the 274 will be used for such updates of
provider information. It may be a good idea to design your system to
anticipate this. Follow this link:
Click on guest to log in as a guest. Then click on the topic to the
left titled "#103 Health Care Provider Information". You should then see a
link to the right to download the draft of the 274 transaction. If you
plan to leave the provider update portion within the 278 application, I would
use a technique to designate this part of the application as non-standard for
the 278. See my response for the next question.
2. The HIPAA bill states
that if any extra information (not part of the HIPAA specification) is presented
in a DDE system, that this information must be clearly denoted as non-standard
data. The HIPAA bill is unclear as to the acceptable approaches in denoting this
extra information. We have gotten feedback from HHS that using a different
color, flagging with a footnote, or placing these items in a separate section of
the screen would be acceptable. We get the impression that this is fairly
flexible and any reasonable approach to clearly differentiating the standard
from non-standard data would give
you compliance.
3. Our understanding of being data compliant on
the response is that the required fields on the 278
response should be available, but you don't necessarily have to dump all of
the response information at the user at once. We plan to provide limited
information on the immediate response, such as the authorization number and any
truncated dates or authorized amounts. The user can then follow a link to
view all of the response information for the authorization. Our
understanding is that the ordering or layout of the response information does
not have to follow the IG.
4. We also have a required set of
pre-certification questions that we must ask for our business purposes. We
are denoting these questions as non-standard HIPAA data as I mentioned for
question #2.
Thought you might be interested .. we had an issue as to what the
requirement was for DDE systems as far as displaying code sets .. whether we
could provide our own descriptions for some codes. Here is the response we
got from Stanley Nachimson:
"The critical item is that you provide at least the HIPAA codes.
Additional explanatory information is optional - it can be shown, but is
certainly not required. Nor can the additional information put restrictions on
the codes which would be in conflict with the IG or the code set
maintainer."
If anyone thinks we have made any invalid assumptions on any of the
responses here, please repond to this group ...
__________________________________________
| Michael Fields This message, including files attached to it, may contain confidential information that is intended only for the use of the ADDRESSEE(S) named above. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of the information contained in this message, or the taking of any action in reliance upon the information, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message from your system. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: X12 278 - DDE Questions
|
- X12 278 - DDE Questions Lisa.LaMont
- Re: X12 278 - DDE Questions Cecil_L_Bohannan
- RE: X12 278 - DDE Questions Fields, Michael
- RE: X12 278 - DDE Questions Christopher J. Feahr, OD

