I don't know that the question should be "How are health plans
accommodating the required 837 Professional elements that can not be
obtained from a paper claim?", but rather "What are providers, their
vendors and their clearinghouses doing to fill the gap between data
available today and that required under HIPAA?".  The requirements for
compliance are defined by HIPAA's implementation guide, not by the
payer.  A payer could tell a provider that they do not require any of
the data you mention below (and many will) but that does not mean the
provider is compliant.  Also, the issue may not just be format.  A data
gap can exists not only in the HCFA but also the NSF and even in an 837
since the data must be collected and stored in a system in order to be
populated in a claim.  In some cases, even though an 837 claim format
can be produced, the required data elements don't exist.

Clearinghouses and payers are working closely to try and find a work
around to the kinds of elements you have mentioned here.  Some of those
solutions will result in a fully compliant claim and some will not.  In
some cases it would appear the payers and clearinghouses have weighed
the cost of compliance and decided the cost to comply outweighs the risk
of non-compliance.  The question providers should be asking themselves
is whether or not they agree and want to take on that risk.  Providers
should not simply hand over their compliance to a clearinghouse or
payer.  They should take an active role in determining what compliance
will mean for them and what risks they are willing to take. 

One comment on the data you mention below, the HCFA 1500 allows either
an LMP or a date of illness.  A single field is used for this
information and no indicator exists to differentiate one type of date
from another so unless a clearinghouse can find another way to determine
which is which, it may not map the date correctly.  Also, what about the
pregnant women who is diagnosed with gestational diabetes?   In that
case both an LMP and a date of illness is required and cannot be
accommodated on a HCFA.  

No simple answers.  Providers need to do their own gap analysis and,
working with their clearinghouse, vendors and payers, come up with
solutions they are comfortable with.  They should not allow another
entity to determine the acceptable level of risk.  Some clearinghouses
are offering gap analysis services where they compare the actual claim
data sent today with the data required in the same claim post HIPAA.
This would save the provider a lot of time and allow it to look at only
the data gaps that impact its claims.  Providers should be asking their
clearinghouse how it plans to assist with this.

Don't know if that helps but I hope in generates more discussion.

Marcallee Jackson
Long Beach, CA
562-438-6613

-----Original Message-----
From: Art Schenkman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:49 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: Anne Romer
Subject: Missing Elements on an HCFA 1500

How are health plans accommodating the required 837 Professional
elements
that can not be obtained from a paper claim?
    ambulance services, spinal manipulation, pregnancy

For example, 

If a chiropractor does a spinal manipulation, we would expect him to
submit
his bill on a HCFA 1500 claim form

For spinal manipulation, there are several required fields within the
837.

  Within the 2300 loop CR2 detail (Spinal Manipulation Service
Information),

   the following information is required and can not be found on a paper
claim:
        Treatment Series Number, Treatment Count, Subluxation Level
Code,
Treatment Period Count
        Monthly Treatment Count, Patient Condition Code, Complication
Indicator

For ambulance transports, loop 2300 detail CR1 (Ambulance
Certification),
required and not on a paper claim

    Ambulance Transport Code, Ambulance Transport Reason Code.

For obstetrical claims, the paper claim provides the last menstrual
cycle
date but not the estimated date of birth.

We are required to include this information when we submit the 837 to
our
state agency.

Has anyone addressed and or resolved an issue similar to this?

NOTE:  This is a re-send of two earlier emails that have experienced
receipt
problems.  This message is in PLAIN TEXT FORMAT


**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.

======================================================

The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated.
The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the
individual
participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI
Board of
Directors nor WEDI SNIP.  If you wish to receive an official opinion,
post
your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is
specifically prohibited.




**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.

======================================================

The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated.  The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual
participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of
Directors nor WEDI SNIP.  If you wish to receive an official opinion, post
your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is
specifically prohibited.

Reply via email to