Am Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:36:41 +0100
schrieb Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:14:58 +0100
> Stefan Scheffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > > There are some viable alternatives to lqt (I'm asking because I've
> > > little or none experience in here)?
> > Possibly libavformat. All the other quicktime libraries I know of
> > work the same way as libquicktime. 
> 
> Uhm, I've just spotted those two functions in libquicktime API:
> 
> http://libquicktime.sourceforge.net/doc/apiref/group__video__decode.html#ga11
> (quicktime_read_frame)
> http://libquicktime.sourceforge.net/doc/apiref/group__video__encode.html#ga5
> (quicktime_write_frame)
> 
> Just wondering if those can be useful for future tc module
> 

I've had mixed results with those. They are used for reading and writing
in passthrough mode already but only seem to work correctly with frame
based codec like mjpeg or raw. The lqt codec possibly writes stuff
into the header struct while encoding.
(could be that I made a mistake or two though)
Oh and they only work with video.

I've had some proplems moving the patch to 1.1 btw. The
module seems to read the audio faster(or ahead) of the video which
causes a segfault at the end. After a 3 mins clip the audio is
about 20 frames ahead.
Is there anything I should pay attention too?

stefan

Reply via email to