On 06/07/06, Phil Ehrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 352x288 there is a visible difference?!
Oh yes.
What kind of content are you encoding? Is your target VCD?
Take a look at http://www.ysrnry.co.uk/tvprog/ - it's mainly captures of old computer games, so there's lots of sold blocks of colour, plus lots of photos and the odd bit of animation. TMPGEnc produces visibly smoother output with fewer artifacts.
Can anybody comment on *why* TMPGEnc produces higher quality output?
From my uneducated POV, I notice that TMPGEnc MPEGs are ~10% larger
than MPEGs encoded using other tools. I guess that means it stores extra detail, and that bumps up the display quality. If anyone can come up with a set of Transcode options that matches or beats TMPGEnc then that would be incredibly useful to me. Meanwhile, can anyone suggest how to switch off this "RIFF chunking" business that's currently throwing TMPGEnc? Ta, Nick -- Nick Humphries [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.egyptus.co.uk
