Hi, 0n 06/09/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:39 sean told me:
> Francesco Romani wrote: > >Hi all > > > >I'd like to know how many users are running a self-compiled CVS HEAD > >version > >and how many are still stuck on 1.0.x branch. I guess all the people that > >uses transcode packaged by distributions is using 1.0.2 (+ patches), but > >there is someone out there that runs HEAD? :) > > > >OK, CVS HEAD isn't ready for prime time (there is some know bugs, most > >notably multilib troubles, an X11 issue and something else that I'm missing > >right now), but transcode users have a long tradition of courage and > >braveness ;) > > Neither brave nor courageous, but 1.0.2 wouldn't build on > fc6t2 amd64, but cvs head would. Wouldn't prevent you from using cvs and I never tried FC, but probably this workaround: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145849 could solve this problem on FC, too. -- bye maik
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
