On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:48:17 -0700 David Liontooth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] > > My effort is quite ready to be merged in CVS (actual patch is ~670 line > > with context), there is just a known regression that I must address > > before. (^C causes lock). > Just so I understand: is your patch laying the ground for better > synchronization code, or is it a cleanup of the actual synchronization code? That aim to be both of above, with focus on cleanup, since we're hurry (well, hurry given our resources) to release 1.1.0, so there isn't room for a deeper review. Anyway, I have plans for a full rewrite. Stuff for 1.2.0 and beyond. > > Allan Snider has kindly sent some really interesting patches on -devel on > > last days. My plan is to merge *all* of them during 1.1.0 alpha cycle. > Could you give details? Of course. In a nutshell, there is a new promising interlace/telecine filter on the block, http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.transcode.devel/4257 and some serious updates for extsub filter: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.transcode.devel/4270 > It's great to see you're focusing on the guts of transcode; I'm > convinced that's the right choice. > My wishlist beyond that is an x264 export module. We already have so in 1.1.0, as well as aac encoder module, rewritten libavcodec and lame modules. They are written as part of new-module-system (in short: no longer export modules, but encoder/multiplexors splitten) effort. Unfortunately, such effort was not completed in time for 1.1.0, so they will not shipped with new release :( > And (ir)regular developmental status reports would be much appreciated. I'll do my best, but I can't promise anything ;) Bests, -- Francesco Romani - Ikitt ['people always complain, no matther what you do'] IM contact : (email first, Antispam default deny!) icq://27-83-87-867 tiny homepage : http://fromani.exit1.org (see IDEAS if you want send code!) known bugs : http://tcfoundry.hostme.it/mantis (EXPERIMENTAL)
