On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 22:53 +0100, Thomas Wehrspann wrote: > > I think the biggest problem is to have a tool or something that produces > > docbook sources from source code annotations (changing STYLE to conform > > to, say, doxygen is NOT an option today or in the near future; maybe > > this tool -and a small STYLE change, that should be feasible- > > www.naturaldocs.org) can help us. > > > I also thought of naturaldocs, because Andrew don't like doxygen (or at least > it's style)
I'll give a spin as soon as I gain some time and report on ML the results. > I attached the docbook source and the generated manpage. > Most of the work was done by a conversion script with some manual finetuning. Looks really good at first glance; I'll commit when I'm done with my part. Thanks for your job. Bests, -- Francesco Romani // Ikitt [ Out of memory. ~ We wish to hold the whole sky, ~ But we never will. ]
