So i have two websites both using the same transfer.xml file. They
both are constantly being hit by our internal google search appliance
as well as outside traffic. Just upgraded from 0.6 to 1.1 (yes don't
ask)....This is on CF 7.02, windows 2003 box.
Problem is that Jrun memory slowly climbs to 99% cpu every couple
hours, forcing me to restart CF.
The main transfer caching is on the editorial side. Same content to
all users. So my question is, should i be using instance or
application scope caching? I've currently trying...
<objectCache>
<defaultcache>
<maxobjects value="100"/>
<accessedminutestimeout value="30"/>
<scope type="instance"/>
</defaultcache>
</objectCache>
Tried many variations of this, including having separate <cache>
nodes, and set to none. Just trying to find best practices here for a
high traffic newspaper/editorial type of website...Setting scope type
equal to 'none' seems to give the best results but....
Thanks,
Dave
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Before posting questions to the group please read:
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"transfer-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
