If ColdFusion is still around after I retire, I just want to do nothing but write and perfect software that does things that I hate doing.
Like introspecting the DB and building the Transfer config file. Nicely. And Completely. With views to let you choose the directions for places where o2m and m2o would work well. That actually deduces intent and makes suggestions. Yes, someday. For now, we work, yes? YES! I don't like Illudium for just that reason, Dan, and I'd much rather just start with a skeleton Transfer config and build as I go than try to use a generator that isn't perfect. Laterz, J On Nov 12, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Dan O'Keefe wrote: > Alan, > > I looked at that recently as well - it has a few issues and a few > things not clear about configuring it. Tried to contact Roland but > never heard back from him. I eventually figured it out and was able > to get it to run. > > The original reason I was looking at it was it creates the > relationships for you and Illidium does not. It also does the whole > DB at one time. I think there are some issues with the XML it > generates, so I am sticking with Illidium for my transfer.xml code > and modifying the XSL template to suite my needs. I can still run > the transferConfig tool and grab my oneToMany's, etc from there, > but will have to look at it more closely when I do to see if it is > accurate or not. > > Dan > -------------- > Dan O'Keefe --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
