Right > I am still kinda new so I didnt feel like spending a ton of time trying to fix transfer to work with 8 but its looking like I might have to do that. Everything in Transfer works fine so far on 8 except when I update my config to use relationships. Any thoughts?
Here is the Join Syntax for 8 select p.part_id, s.supplier_name from part p, supplier s where p.supplier_id = s.supplier_id (+); 9+ select p.part_id,s.supplier_name from part as p left outer join supplier as s ON s.supplier_id = p.supplier_id On Dec 1, 11:41 am, "Dan Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan, > Are you talking about the (+) syntax? > > I've refactored that syntax out to use the Join Keywords in Oracle 9 & 10, > though I can't remember if that is valid for 8i. I'm just asking for my own > benefit... > > DW > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Dan Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is this still unsupported? I have a database that is 8i and didnt > > realize it was not supported until I was half way through a project. > > Everything works fine until you get into doing JOINS. Oracle 8i has > > some funny syntax to create joins and changed over in 9. If its not > > supported has anyone updated transfer to support this? > > -- > "Come to the edge, he said. They said: We are afraid. Come to the edge, he > said. They came. He pushed them and they flew." > > Guillaume Apollinaire quotes --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
