That is pretty much it. Transfer only allows retrieval of singular objects, due to performance concerns with getting large data sets as objects (CFC creation is still quite slow).
That being said, it's something I've been thinking about a great deal, just not quite sure which approach to take with it. Mark On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Josh Nathanson <joshnathan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey all, > > > > Is there a way to get a collection of transfer objects, where there is not a > onetomany relationship? > > > > For example I have a User object, but I want to get a collection of all user > objects, that would represent all users in the database. And there is no > "uber" parent object in the database that would have all users as its > children. > > > > I'm finding myself using Transfer.list to get a query, and then looping the > query and using Transfer.get to populate an array with Transfer objects. Is > that the way to do it, or is there a shortcut or a better way? > > > > -- Josh > > > > > > > > > > > > -- E: mark.man...@gmail.com W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to transfer-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to transfer-dev-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
