Thanks for clarifying that for me, Ezra. :)
Paul
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Matthew <matthewbchamb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> @Ezra: that makes complete sense. I solved it this morning as per my
> last reply. Thanks for confirming.
>
> Cheers
> Matthew
>
> On Feb 20, 10:31 am, Ezra Parker <ezrapar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Matthew,
> >
> > I think you misunderstood Paul's reply. You do not have to create a
> > decorator to use the first approach he listed:
> >
> > > objGallery = transfer.getTransfer().new("Gallery");
> > > objProduct = transfer.getTransfer().get("Product",form.Id);
> > > objGallery.setTestField("cat");
> > > objGallery.setProduct(objProduct);
> > > transfer.getTransfer().save(objGallery);
> >
> > Transfer will generate the setProduct() method for the Product
> > ManyToOne composition, and you can just call it on the Gallery object.
> > You do need to pass it a Product object as its argument, however, not
> > the ProductId key. If you instead wanted to use a setProductId()
> > method, then *that* would require that you use a decorator for your
> > Gallery object so you could add the method yourself.
> >
> > Does that make sense?
> >
> > --
> > Ezra Parker
> >
>
--
Paul Marcotte
Fancy Bread - in the heart or in the head?
http://www.fancybread.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Before posting questions to the group please read:
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"transfer-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to transfer-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
transfer-dev-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
