Interesting use case, Nick. I'm not sure what I think about it. I can understand why you need to go the route you've chosen. I am not so sure this belongs inside of Transfer. A large part of Transfer revolves around the caching layer.
What benefits were you looking to get out of using Transfer? DW On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:21 PM, NickHaggmark <[email protected]> wrote: > > One additional thing I forgot to mention is that this new product is, > for all intensive purposes, a duplication of an existing successful > product with a few feature changes. We have a fairly short delivery > time line for this implementation, so that is why I'm not able to > completely redesign the back end. > > Thanks! > > Nick > > > -- “Come to the edge, he said. They said: We are afraid. Come to the edge, he said. They came. He pushed them and they flew.” Guillaume Apollinaire quotes --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
