http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/browse_thread/thread/d63bba748e48aa75
On Mar 17, 2:09 pm, Jim <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I an new to transfer and had a question. Is it possible or desirable > to create transfer objects where there is no database table? > > For instance, you might have a logical object that exists across > pysical tables (a few columns from each) that is manipulated through > stored procedures. > > Some possible solutions I considered are: > > 1. Create a database view for the logical object. Use a decorator to > override where a stored procedure is needed. > 2. For the table attributes in the transfer.xml file, just put a > blank string, then set a decorator and override the get, delete, save, > etc. methods as necessary. I don't know if transfer will like this. > 3. Forget trying to create a logical object and just use the ones > that relate to physical tables and get the necessary objects for the > information you need. > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks, > Jim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
