You win an email from me saying 'thanks for the patch' :D

Mark

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Chris Peterson <[email protected]> wrote:

>  a quick patch
> ....
> What do I win?
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On 4/1/09 3:34 PM, "Mark Mandel" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There is a ticket around on the tracker for implementing a list of
> relationships you wish to traverse down, but it hasn't been implemented yet.
>
> Wouldn't be hard to do if anyone wants to write a quick patch ;o)
>
> Mark
>
> 2009/4/1 Aurélien DELEUSIÈRE <[email protected]>
>
> My mistake! I've use the event delete to clean some files on hard drive
> linked to data in tables not to cascade something else...
>
> Thanks Brian for your information on Visitor I will have a look !
>
> Le 1 avril 2009 14:34, Aurélien DELEUSIÈRE <[email protected]> a écrit
> :
>
> I confirm your feeling Jeroen. Yesterday I've tested the cascade delete and
> crash a lot of content in my db... grrr...
>
> The way the cascade is implemented today is quitely not usable even with
> the limit set. I've managed my own cascade delete through (the
> powerfull) actionBefore / AfterDelete TransferEvent...
>
> Cheers -
>
>
> 2009/4/1 Jeroen Knoef <[email protected]>
>
>
> Hi all,
> The cascadeDelete function traverses all relationships, both up and
> down. This appears counter intuitive to me. As far as I know, DBMS's
> cascade in one direction, down to records that are referencing the
> record being deleted. It looks natural to me if Transfer would have
> implemented a similar functionality. With the current implementation,
> this method is possibly very dangerous, because a delete of some
> record could clear out the whole database.
>
> I know there is the depth argument, but my objects don't always know
> how deep to go. Also, a change in the data model might lead to a code
> change, which is what Transfer is abstracting.
>
> Can you explain why this method behaves as it does? Maybe with some
> examples where this behaviour is just what you need? I'm quite curious
> because I couldn't come up with one myself.... thanks for replying.
>
> Jeroen
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>


-- 
E: [email protected]
W: www.compoundtheory.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Before posting questions to the group please read:
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"transfer-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to