Which version is this? I thought I had allowed for it, possibly in 1.1? I will have a look.
Mark On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Brian Kotek <[email protected]> wrote: > While I suppose Mark could add this pretty easily, it sounds like a pretty > bad decision to not specify the access level of a method. Is there a reason > you don't want to clearly specify the access level? > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Chris H <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> If the access property of a function is not defined, it defaults to >> public. But Transfer is looking for it during during the creation of >> the "advise" method creation, because an "Element ACCESS is undefined >> in METADATA.:" error is thrown if it is not explicitly defined. can >> this be fixed to use the default of "public" when it is undefined? >> > > > > > -- E: [email protected] W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
