Wow...right on the money. I should have asked sooner! Thanks again! Dustin
On May 14, 4:40 pm, Mark Mandel <[email protected]> wrote: > Transfer will discard an object straight away, so the object should not be > there. > > Maybe you have a copy of a object which isn't attached to the cache which > has it's children already loaded? > > Mark > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Dustin Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I was just wondering, when I delete an object with Transfer, how long > > until that object is removed from the cache? Is there any kind of > > delay? > > > Here is the reason I ask. I'm running into a problem where I have a > > parent object that contains many child objects (a One-to-Many > > relationship). The problem is that when I delete one of the child > > objects and then load the entire set of child objects into a page for > > display, the page displays the deleted object. When I check the > > database immediately after the page is loaded the record is in fact > > gone...as it should be. And when I subsequently load the page again > > the shows the list of child objects, the one I deleted is no longer > > there. > > > The only thing I can think of is that after I delete the child, > > Transfer takes a couple moments to delete it from the cache. Is this > > possible or is something else going on here? > > -- > E: [email protected] > W:www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
