As long as your definitions are the same, it should be okay.. In fact, if your definitions aren't the same, they should be unique enough that they won't cross over (the def name is a hash of it's string, and some other parts).
Easy way to determine if it will work - load test ;o) Mark On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:39 AM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > > We need to use multiple datasources, so we will have multiple > instances of the transfer factory with multiple config files. > > My question is, can they all share the same definitions path? > > From my testing, it appears that even with identical object names in > each datasource, it still creates unique .transfer file names, but we > just want to confirm that this will not cause problems. > > > -- E: [email protected] T: http://www.twitter.com/neurotic W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
