Dan, no matter if you get() or new() it should always be a decorator, if you have defined one (get() calls new() to get a new object to populate).
Can you provide a code sample to show what you are doing? Mark On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Dan Vega <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok so I just don't understand the object cache. I will have to read up > on it. If I create a new object and then save that object to the > database everything works great. If I then try to get that object > again I am working with a tranfser object instead of my decorator. If > I were to re initialize my application and clear the cache it works as > I need it to. If I set the cache in the transfer xml to the following > everything works on every request. > > <objectCache> > <defaultcache> > <scope type="none"/> > </defaultcache> > </objectCache> > > Sorry for bothering anyone but if anyone has got some resources please > let me know. For now I am going to ask Google! > > > -- E: [email protected] T: http://www.twitter.com/neurotic W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
