But double works in both...

On Aug 13, 6:02 pm, Mark Mandel <[email protected]> wrote:
> When I wrote it, 'float' was the only cfqueryparam that worked across
> databases for both integer and floating point numbers.
>
> I can't remember if I tested double or not.
>
> This is where we start getting into the differences between CF engines...
> and there is not much I can do about that.
>
> I break for one, or I break for the other :P
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Jennifer Larkin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Since when is "working better than expected" a "bug?"
>
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:04 AM,
> > whostheJBoss<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Thoughts on this Mark? This is definitely a bug in CF that is
> > > reflected as a bug in Transfer. This is, I repeat, NOT a bug in Railo.
> > > As of now I have to change the numeric mapping to double to get my
> > > insert to work...
>
> > > On Aug 10, 12:10 pm, whostheJBoss <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> Ok, well, I've taken this up with Railo and...
>
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/railo/browse_thread/thread/d8e20b98308.
> > ..
>
> > >> Any thoughts on this Mark?
>
> > >> If you want the short version...
>
> > >> "What happens if you change the line from "cf_sql_float"to
> > >> "cf_sql_double" or "cf_sql_decimal"?   I bet it's a truncation issue,
> > >> where ColdFusion considers cf_sql_float and cf_sql_double to be
> > >> equivalent, but Railo is correctly using reduced precision for
> > >> cf_sql_float (causing your erroneous value).  To put that another way,
> > >> I suspect a bug in ColdFusion (not reducing precision on cf_sql_float)
> > >> is masking a bug in Transfer (using an imprecise type for numerics)
> > >> that Railo's correct implementation (reducing cf_sql_float precision)
> > >> unmasks.  :)
>
> > >> cheers,
> > >> barneyb"
>
> > >> "I'm pretty sure all that's needed for confirmation is to change the
> > >> type from cf_sql_float to cf_sql_decimal or cf_sql_double and confirm
> > >> that that fixes the issue (just like cf_sql_bigint) does.
> > >> --
> > >> Barney Boisvert
> > >> [email protected]http://www.barneyb.com/";
>
> > >> "Hi whostheJBoss
>
> > >> Railo translate CF_SQL_FLOAT to java.sql.Types.FLOAT
> > >> then java.sql.PreparedStatement.setFloat(int index,float value) is
> > >> used
> > >> in this case,
> > >> i think adobeCF use java.sql.PreparedStatement.setDouble(int
> > >> index,double value) instead of setFloat.
>
> > >> but this is definitly the wrong way, like barney has written before
> > >> "cf_sql_double" or "cf_sql_decimal  is the way to go.
> > >> from my perspective it is wrong to change this to "setDouble".
>
> > >> what do you thnk?
>
> > >> greetings micha
>
> > >> --
> > >> Michael Offner-Streit
> > >> CTO
> > >> Railo Technologies GmbH
> > >> [email protected]"
>
> > >> On Aug 5, 5:23 pm, Mark Mandel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > numeric maps to using cf_sql_float.
>
> > >> > cf_sql_float is a parameter that will correctly handle floating points
> > >> > across databases.
>
> > >> > It seems that Railo has an issue with how it is mapping cf_sql_float,
> > so it
> > >> > cannot handle BigInt values in the database you are using, whereas on
> > CF it
> > >> > has no such trouble.
>
> > >> > Mark
>
> > >> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:07 AM, whostheJBoss <
> > [email protected]>wrote:
>
> > >> > > You happen to know what part of Transfer the bug is affecting? I'd
> > be
> > >> > > happy to take it up with the guys at Railo, just need to know what I
> > >> > > should be asking.
>
> > >> > > Is Transfer checking the column type of the objects and then using
> > >> > > that type to wrap them with a cfsqltype? Does that mean Railo is not
> > >> > > providing this information to Transfer, so then it is falling back
> > on
> > >> > > the default cfsqltype for numeric, which in this case happens to be
> > >> > > float?
>
> > >> > > Basically, is Transfer unable to get the type from Railo so it runs
> > >> > > this:
>
> > >> > > <cfelseif block.mapparam.type eq "numeric">
> > >> > >     <cfqueryparam value="#value#" cfsqltype="cf_sql_float"
> > >> > > list="#param.list#" null="#param.isNull#">
>
> > >> > > And sets it to float?
>
> > >> > > Thanks!
>
> > >> > > On Aug 5, 4:52 pm, Mark Mandel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > > > Sounds like a bug in Railo to me.
>
> > >> > > > Mark
>
> > >> > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:18 AM, whostheJBoss <
> > [email protected]
> > >> > > >wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > You always manage to come in and say something very simple and I
> > go
> > >> > > > > "Oh yeah!!!"
>
> > >> > > > > Anyway, CF9 has no problem with this, so it must be... a Railo
> > thing.
> > >> > > > > Err, a Transfer / Railo thing.
>
> > >> > > > > So, what can be done to have Transfer see the right data type in
> > >> > > > > Railo?
>
> > >> > > > > Thanks!!!
>
> > >> > > > > On Aug 4, 2:52 pm, Mark Mandel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > You're also on Railo aren't you?
>
> > >> > > > > > Mark
>
> > >> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:17 AM, whostheJBoss <
> > >> > > [email protected]
> > >> > > > > >wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > > > By the way, thanks for helping!!! :)
>
> > >> > > > > > > On Aug 4, 12:31 pm, Jennifer Larkin <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > Which version of MySQL are you using?
>
> > >> > > > > > > > OK, so looking again at the two values in question:
> > >> > > > > > > >1474075992
> > >> > > > > > > >1474076030
>
> > >> > > > > > > > It is certainly feasible that you have encountered a
> > floating
> > >> > > point
> > >> > > > > > > > error. In a ten digit number, the second number is off by
> > 38. The
> > >> > > > > > > > thing is, Transfer doesn't cause floating point errors--
> > they are
> > >> > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > cause of the software that Transfer runs on, and MySQL has
> > >> > > floating
> > >> > > > > > > > point errors. I've used Transfer on Oracle and as I said,
> > I've
> > >> > > never
> > >> > > > > > > > encountered this problem.
>
> > >> > > > > > > > So, I looked up MySQL floating point errors and discovered
> > this
> > >> > > > > article:
>
> >http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/problems-with-float.html
>
> > >> > > > > > > > Which leads me to believe that if you are using a version
> > of
> > >> > > MySQL
> > >> > > > > > > > prior to 5.0.5, that you should upgrade to 5.0.5, which
> > has
> > >> > > greater
> > >> > > > > > > > floating point precision.
>
> > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:09 PM, whostheJBoss<
> > >> > > > > [email protected]>
> > >> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > The column in question here is not a key, it's an
> > additional
> > >> > > field,
> > >> > > > > > > > > nothing special. Just a BIGINT named customID, but it's
> > not the
> > >> > > > > > > > > primary key. The primary key field is userID.
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > As of now, any column with datatype INT or BIGINT is
> > being
> > >> > > saved
> > >> > > > > > > > > incorrectly by Transfer. This one in particular was INT,
> > then I
> > >> > > > > > > > > changed to BIGINT trying to fix the problem. So, as of
> > now it
> > >> > > is
> > >> > > > > > > > > BIGINT and will be staying that way.
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > The same column using the exact same SQL that Transfer
> > >> > > generates in
> > >> > > > > a
> > >> > > > > > > > > regular <cfquery> work fine because it isn't wrapped in
> > >> > > > > > > > > cfsqltype="cf_sql_float" query param which is invisible
> > to the
> > >> > > > > debug
> > >> > > > > > > > > output. (Which is why I didn't see it before.)
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > The column it does work for is VARCHAR, which makes
> > complete
> > >> > > sense.
> > >> > > > > It
> > >> > > > > > > > > just takes the number and inserts it as a string.
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > Transfer has this statement:
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > <cfelseif block.mapparam.type eq "numeric">
> > >> > > > > > > > >        <cfqueryparam value="#value#"
> > cfsqltype="cf_sql_float"
> > >> > > > > > > > > list="#param.list#" null="#param.isNull#">
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > Which takes any "numeric" property of a defined Transfer
> > object
> > >> > > and
> > >> > > > > > > > > forces it to float, even if the database has it marked
> > as
> > >> > > BIGINT.
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 11:17 am, Jennifer Larkin <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > >> I've used transfer with tons of bigint columns and
> > never had
> > >> > > this
> > >> > > > > > > > >> problem. I would assume that your key is bigint and not
> > float,
> > >> > > but
> > >> > > > > you
> > >> > > > > > > > >> aren't having a problem with the key being set as
> > float. So
> > >> > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > >> question is, why does this work for some columns and
> > not for
> > >> > > > > others.
>
> > >> > > > > > > > >> What is the datatype on the column that is getting
> > saved
> > >> > > correctly
> > >> > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > > > >> the one that is getting saved incorrectly?
>
> > >> > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:36 AM, whostheJBoss<
> > >> > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > > > > >> > Ok, I've figured it out.
>
> > >> > > > > > > > >> > This was absolutely something in Transfer.
>
> > >> > > > > > > > >> > In:
>
> > >> > > > > > > > >> > transfer.com.sql.QueryExecution
>
> > >> > > > > > > > >> > This line:
>
> > >> > > > > > > > >> > <cfelseif block.mapparam.type eq "numeric">
> > >> > > > > > > > >> >        <cfqueryparam value="#value#"
> > >> > > cfsqltype="cf_sql_float"
> > >> > > > > > > > >> > list="#param.list#" null="#param.isNull#">
>
> > >> > > > > > > > >> > If I replace it with:
>
> > >> > > > > > > > >> > <cfelseif block.mapparam.type eq "numeric">
> > >> > > > > > > > >> >        <cfqueryparam value="#value#"
> > >> > > cfsqltype="CF_SQL_BIGINT"
> > >> > > > > > > > >> > list="#param.list#" null="#param.isNull#">
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Before posting questions to the group please read:
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"transfer-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to