On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Scott Brady <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK, this may be yet another hard-to-describe issue.

<snip>

> So, I guess the question is why newly-saved object (release) reports
> as a TransferObject instead of what it's supposed to,
> releaseDecorator, until I refresh the application variables?
>

I found the fix. Something I neglected to mention is that I was
handling the save() function through our BaseDecorator instead of
using the transferFactory's save() function  Initially, this was so we
could programmatically use transactions or not, if we wanted.   since
we're not doing that anyway, I can just use the standard save
functionality, and that removes the problem.

Scott


-- 
-----------------------------------------
Scott Brady
http://www.scottbrady.net/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Before posting questions to the group please read:
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"transfer-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to