I have written a custom TQL that handles my problem and all is great,
so this is not a question I *need* the answer to, but I'm still quite
curious WHY this is happening. Any thoughts on why calling
getPostsArray() first breaks the functionality to add a tag?

On Sep 26, 7:53 am, whostheJBoss <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, another update... if I set proxied="false" on:
>
> <onetomany name="posts" lazy="true" proxied="true">
>                         <link to="posts.post" column="userID"/>
>                         <collection type="array">
>                         </collection>
> </onetomany>
>
> Then it works! I can call getPostsArray() first and still add tags.
> So, having the onetomany posts object on users.user proxied causes the
> odd behavior. I don't think this should be happening.
>
> Yes, it works, but this means my call to getPostsArray() gives me an
> array of all of my actual posts.post objects instead of the proxied
> object, which I need. The posts.post objects are far too heavy when
> retrieving 100 (or in the case of my application, 500) objects. I need
> the proxy.
>
> Shouldn't I be able to call getPostsArray() and get proxied objects
> without this preventing me from adding tags.tag objects to the
> manytomany relationship?
>
> Seems like I should...
>
> I'd like to know what is is in the mechanics of making the parent's
> (users.user) relationship with the parent (posts.post) of the
> manytomany (tags.tag) proxied that breaks the adding of the manytomany
> on the child object (posts.post)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Before posting questions to the group please read:
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"transfer-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to