It shouldn't matter what the file names are, although you will want a distinction between decorator files and transfer object files.
I have to ask though - what is the reasoning behind not wanting $ and @ in file names? That's the first time I've ever heard that one before? Mark On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Jason Dean <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am using Transfer for one of my sites and one of our network > administrators recently came to me and told me that they have been > automatically deleting my Transfer definition files because they > contain illegal characters. It seems that our admins have flagged $ > and @ as illegal characters for file names. > > So a file name like : roles.role > $C73CAD139EEB13887CFF611101C1301E.transfer is illegal on our servers. > > I found the area within Transfer (DecoratorWriter.cfc and > ObjectWriter.cfc) where these files are written. The comments seem to > indicate that those symbols are being used to make them "look like UDF > & CFC Java class names". So I am wondering if I can remove these > symbols from the names and expect Transfer to work correctly? Or will > that break the framework? Do I need to at least use somethign > different for transferObjects and Decorators? Or does it not matter? > > Thanks, > > Jason > > > > -- E: [email protected] T: http://www.twitter.com/neurotic W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
