In a previous question to this list, I mentioned that I'm working on an Address object that is composed into both a Company object and a User object. I'm currently working with the Company>Address relationship and building a couple of forms to manage Companies and Addresses.
I have a form intended to modify Addresses associated with a single Company (one company can have multiple addresses). It contains both a CompanyID and AddressID. My first exercise in saving an Address, did so without regard of the CompanyID. Essentially, the handler took the AddressID, located the correct Transfer Object, cloned it, populated, validated and saved the Address without any knowledge of a Company. This seemed to be working fine. However, now I'm wondering if I should have started by retrieving the Company and accessing the Address via the generated o2m methods. And if so, I'll probably have a couple of follow up questions. :) TIA Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
