I have not read through the entire thread, but based upon your statement about SQL vs. a loop I would say just do it in SQL and then discard the affeced objects from the Transfer cache.
HTH On Friday, December 18, 2009, pedrobl <[email protected]> wrote: > > I guess there's no way to do this easily with transfer... As I said in > my first email, right now you need to loop through all relations, and > set each foreign to the other one. > > From my point of view, this is unacceptable, specially when there's > such a better alternative, the good old UPDATE that gets this done in > one SQL sentence. :( > > I have tried the looping, and it has a horrible performance. > > Happy holidays everyone! :) > > Pedro. > > -- > Before posting questions to the group please read: > http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "transfer-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -- Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
