Hello, > You said you have been working at storage level on Pootle. I would > like to know about your implementation of plural forms in xliff.
Sorry for the This is actually a contested point right now. Currently I have the following Python data structure: [(msgid, msgstr), (msgid, msgstr), ...] (i.e., a list of 2-tuples). As far as I understand, XLIFF works in a similar way. However, people have raised objections to this structure, and I'm almost convinced to change it to either gettext-style msgid, msgid_plural, msgstr[], or to two lists msgid[] and msgstr[], mostly because of the dynamic number of plurals for different languages. Your thoughts on plural storage are very welcome, because I'm working on integrating Pootle with the new backend and I'd rather have such fundamental things sorted out earlier than later. -- Gintautas Miliauskas http://gintasm.blogspot.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
