Hi,

On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 06:12:08PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting F Wolff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 
> > I agree with you, Christian. And unless something terrible is reported
> > in the next few hours, I'm probably happy to build the official 1.2.0
> > packages. Even the 1.2.0 packages will be hard to maintain for two years
> > though, but hopefully easier than 1.1 :-)
> > 
> > As I said, I can try to make the official build later today. Would you
> > need anything else from my side to help this along? I would really like
> > to see 1.2 in Lenny.
> 
> 
> Leave time for Nicolas to react..:-)....I have no idea whether he
> agrees with me and *he* is the maintainer. I'm just the nagging guy
> who has ideas and makes others implement them...:)

I will ask the Release Managers.
The point is that new upstream releases and big non reviewable changes are
not really accepted.

But the arguments you mention are still valid, and it's worth trying.

Cheers,
-- 
Nekral

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Translate-pootle mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle

Reply via email to