On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:32:33 Josh Paetzel wrote:
> On Monday 06 September 2010 08:31:29 F Wolff wrote:
> > Op Vr, 2010-09-03 om 12:30 -0500 skryf Josh Paetzel:
> > > I've been threatening/promising to stick poole into the FreeBSD ports
> > > tree since 2006!!!
> > > 
> > > It's finally happening for real.  I just finished committing the update
> > > to translate-toolkit 1.8.0 and will be finishing up the pootle port and
> > > committing it with any luck before I start this holiday weekend (in the
> > > US)
> > > 
> > > @freebsd.org hat off
> > > 
> > > The PC-BSD project has been using pootle for it's translations since
> > > 2006, and we've been extremely pleased with it.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for a wonderful piece of software.
> > 
> > Hi Josh
> > 
> > Thanks for the work on getting Pootle into ports!  I guess once you have
> > Pootle 2.1.0 in, it would be easy to update later (you might have seen
> > version 2.1.1 released a few hours after you posted your message :-)
> > 
> > Please keep us up to date, and maybe we can even include instructions on
> > the wiki if the FreeBSD ports are always up to date.
> > 
> > If you are interested, we can also have a look at the integration done
> > in the existing Linux packages. Maybe there are some useful ideas there
> > to get things configured optimally.
> > 
> > Keep well
> > Friedel
> 
> heh, yeah, I saw the new version released.  That's been happening to me for
> years, to be honest I wasn't surprised.  I am going to bring in 2.1.1, most
> of what I had done for 2.1.0 was reusable. :)
> 
> I do have one question.  On FreeBSD config files are in /usr/local/etc,
> pootle wants to create /etc/pootle.  I've tried setting the --prefix to
> /usr/local but that doesn't help.  Setting --root to /usr/local does, but
> then everything else goes into /usr/local/usr/local which isn't a viable
> solution.  Is there an incantation to get /etc/pootle to be
> /usr/local/etc/pootle, or should I just move it manually after the
> install?

heh, the distfile was just rerolled with a few things added, like ak, fo, 
zh_CN added. :)

Is there a different mailing list I need to be on to get notifications of 
events like that?

Changing the distfile without changing the version number in it causes lots of 
problems for FreeBSD's packaging stuff. :(

Essentially what happens is the md5 and sha256 of the distfile are recorded in 
the ports tree.  When the distfile is changed they stop matching.  The ports 
tree tries all the mirrors, and when it can't get the right one it falls back 
to a cached version at *.freebsd.org, which will work, so the changes never 
get into the ports tree without someone noticing and kicking things.

-- 
Thanks,

Josh Paetzel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Translate-pootle mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle

Reply via email to