In a message dated 5/28/01, Robert Pausch writes:

> the statement that the 60mA current limiting is no longer required for 
> Europe is untrue in this general 
> form. Correct is:
> France has executed the right to apply article 18(3) of the RTTE directive 
> for the period of 30 months. 
> For this period the current limiting function shall be provided with TE to 
> be placed on the French market.
> Please review the commission decision 2000/373/EC. (I can forward on 
> request).
> 


Hi Robert:

I described the problem with France in my original posting.  My comments were 
based on the content of the same 2000/373/EC document that you reference, so 
I guess we have a difference of opinion about what this decision requires 
manufacturers to do.

By my reading of Article 1 of 2000/373/EC, the EC has simply specified that 
TE without current limiting must be provided with a declaration that the TE 
is not to be used on phone lines that require current limiting.  There is no 
requirement that TE without current limiting can not be sold in France.

I think that if you review the wording of the decision it will become 
apparent that this is what the Commission has done.  It appears to be a 
political solution where the Commission wanted to appease France without 
weakening the implementation of RTTE Directive.  

In addition to the decision 2000/373/EC, I have a copy of a TCAM letter dated 
February 20, 2000, where more of the background discussion that led to the 
decision is described.  In this discussion, representatives of the Commission 
pointed out that the current limiter problem only affected 22% of France's 
lines, so requiring current limiters on all TE sold in France would unduly 
penalize the users of the other 78% of the lines.  In fact, they argued that 
because 78% of the lines in France did not require current limiting, the 
Commission lacked the authority to impose a blanket requirement that all TE 
sold in France must have current limiting.  

In the end, they opted to impose a requirement that manufacturers of TE 
without current limiting must declare that the TE is not intended for 
connection to PSTN lines that require current limiting.  This leaves open the 
option for a manufacturer of non current limited TE to make this declaration 
and still legally sell the TE in France.

I'm not sure how practical it would be to use this option, since users may 
have no easy way to determine whether their line requires current limiting or 
not.  I would not recommend this option for manufacturers of consumer 
products, but it might be a viable approach for manufacturers of more 
specialized commercial equipment.  In particular, there are some cases where 
an existing commercial product is otherwise compliant with the RTTE, so that 
no redesign would be necessary if the current limiter is not required.  For 
this type of situation, the availability of the declaration option may mean 
the difference between selling a few units in France and selling none at all.

The manufacturer's final decision will depend on a number of factors, 
including the cost impact of providing the limiter, the type of product 
involved, the volume of product to be sold in France, and the timing of the 
product sales.  

It is worth noting that the claimed percentage of affected lines was 22% in 
January 2000, and that even if France Telecom had been granted the delay they 
sought, they felt that these lines would be eliminated by October 2002 
(conveniently equal to the maximum delay allowed under the RTTE).  My guess 
is that since France Telecom did not get the delay they wanted, they may be 
accelerating the phase out of the affected lines.  This suggests that the 
percentage of affected lines is probably much less than 22% today, and is 
probably declining every month.

In summary, I believe that Commission Decision 2000/373/EC does not forbid 
the sale of non current limited TE in France.  Rather, it simply requires 
that such TE be provided with a declaration that the TE is not intended for 
use on lines that require current limiting.  There are probably only a few 
situations where a manufacturer would choose to exercise this option, but the 
option is there.  Fortunately, after October 2002, there will be no need to 
consider the current limiter issue at all.


Joe Randolph
Telecom Design Consultant
Randolph Telecom, Inc.
781-721-2848
http://www.randolph-telecom.com

Reply via email to