Dave this may be a very naive view, but I dont see why anyone would
want to go the cost of this. Why not go for Product Check instead.
The reasons are:
Testing at BZT is so cheap
No samples are examined for the first three years (i.e. none are
examined at all if your product only has a three year life time)
No annual fee
This is in variance to BABT who insist on a full re-test each year!!!
The only reason I can think of to use this route is for a CTR assessed
product in which case I think you may fnd it cost effective compared
with some other authorities.
JohnP
International Compliance Manager
Polycom Inc.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Full Quality Assurance
Author: [email protected] at Internet
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 31/07/96 14:09
Received: by ccmail from polycom.com
>From [email protected]
X-Envelope-From: [email protected]
Received: from europe.std.com by polycom.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA04138; Wed, 31 Jul 96 11:45:06 PDT
Received: by europe.std.com (8.7.5/BZS-8-1.0)
id NAA17148; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 13:48:59 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: europe.std.com: daemon set sender to treg-approval
usin g -f
Received: from world.std.com by europe.std.com (8.7.5/BZS-8-1.0)
id NAA17137; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 13:48:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0)
id AA00756; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 13:48:57 -0400
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 13:48:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jon D Curtis <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Full Quality Assurance
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Received: from relay-2.mail.demon.net (disperse.demon.co.uk) by world.std.com
(5. 65c/Spike-2.0)
id AA02355; Mon, 29 Jul 1996 11:15:41 -0400
Received: from post.demon.co.uk ([158.152.1.72]) by relay-2.mail.demon.net
id ae17526; 29 Jul 96 16:15 +0100
Received: from icc-uk.demon.co.uk ([158.152.251.11]) by relay-3.mail.demon.net
id aa01915; 29 Jul 96 16:07 +0100
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 15:13:40 +0000
To: [email protected]
Subject: Full Quality Assurance
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: TFS Gateway /220000000/221020339/221000883/221080662/
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Hello Treggers,
=20
Does anyone have experience of undergoing full quality assurance=20
assessment against module H as implemented by the German authorities?
=20
Is it the same or similar to BABT's version?
=20
Are there any national "deltas" in a quality sense?
=20
Any comments would be gratefully received.
=20
Best regards,
=20
Dave Wilson
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| InterConnect Communications Ltd | Tel. +44 (0) 1291 620425 |
| Merlin House, Station Road, | Fax. +44 (0) 1291 627119 |
| CHEPSTOW | WWW. http://www.icc-uk.com |=20
| UK | |
| NP6 5PB | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
