Nick, Thank you for the update. I know there are issues in NTR21 that need addressing. As most of TREG knows I've been trying to deal with one. We can only hope all will be solved during the meetings.
Regards, Duane _____________________________________ On Sat, 21 Sep 1996, Nick Evans wrote: > Re: Duane's request > > As many of you will know by now, prTBR21 failed to get the required majority > vote at ETSI. There was an ETSI meeting last week in order to start to sort > out the technical objections. I don't have any information yet on what, if > any, significant decisions were made. > > Our office in Italy has someone very closely involved in the prTBR21 > development. He tells me that at best it will now take to the end of year to > resolve and accept any technical changes required to the scope or content of > the standard. After that it needs to go through the political process of > designation. I understand that the feeling is the very earliest TBR21 > (CTR21) could be available for pan-European approval now would be April 1997 > but don't quote me on this, particularly as I don't know at the time of > writing the outcome of the ETSI meeting last week. > > > Cheers. > Nick > Genesys > Worldwide Product Compliance & Localisation > > ---------- > From: [email protected] on behalf of Duane J Marcroft > Sent: 20 September 1996 19:49 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Status of prTBR 21 > > Treg'rs > > I'm resending this, because I was actually asking for the status of > prTBR 21 not prNTR 21. > > Too old and too many acronyms to keep them all straight. I'm in need of the > weekend :) > > Duane > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 08:41:15 -0700 (PDT) > From: Duane J Marcroft <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Status of prTBR 21 > > > I need an update on prTBR 21. > > Does anyone know the present status? > > Has the issue of limiting the current in the holding circuit to 60 mA been > addressed? The problem is dissipating 2W in a PCMCIA card during current > limiting. > > Is another round of ballots required? > > Thank you in advance. > > Regards, > > Duane Marcroft > > >
