From: Dean Jurgensen <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
To: Tony Fredriksson <[email protected]>
Cc: treg group <[email protected]>,
Judd Stewart <[email protected]>,
PSTC <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: FCC Class A data vs. EN
X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP-QM 3.0.3.960916
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; Name="Message Body"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply to: RE>>FCC Class A data vs. EN55022
Tony,
What about:
1) The electrical rating differences (i.e. 120 V, 60 Hz vs. 230 V, 50 =
Hz); and
2) The test methodology differences (i.e. ANSI C63.4 vs. CISPR =
22/EN55022/CISPR 16);
for conducted and radiated emissions respectively.
Just a thought.
Regards,
Dean Jurgensen
NORTEL, Calgary
[email protected]
--------------------------------------
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 96/11/4 1:21 PM
To: Dean Jurgensen
From: Tony Fredriksson
----- E X T E R N A L L Y O R I G I N A T E D M E S S A G E -----
Judd,
I believe that is is the other way around. EN 55022 data is
accepted for FCC Class A verification or FCC Class B Certification
or Declaration of Conformity. The only modification is that if your
equipment must be scanned above 1 GHz if you have an oscillator
fundamental frequency of 108 MHz or greater.
I do not believe that FCC Class A or B data can be used to
verify compliance with Euro regs. Therefore, the best approach to
use is to do the EN 55022 test.
Has anyone recently heard otherwise?
Regards,
[email protected]
----------
From: Judd Stewart
To: PSTC
Subject: FCC Class A data vs. EN5502
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Friday, November 01, 1996 5:31PM
Hello to all!
I have a question concerning the applicability of data.
Assume a ITE product is Verified FCC Class A and is being readied for
marketing in the EU. (the unit is compliant with EN60950, notified body
confirmed)
Is the (FCC A) data package acceptable as being compliant with EN55022? =
That
is, can I use that data set to support my claim of compliance with =
EN55022?
One of the system engineers heard this on the grapevine and I rather =
doubt
it.
I think the unit will need the full EN55022 data set.
Thanks for the response in advance.
Judd Stewart
619.552.5581
------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by nmisq2.miss.nt.com with SMTP;4 Nov 1996 13:15:50 -0500
Received: from ruebert.ieee.org by corpgate.rich.nt.com with SMTP (PP);
Mon, 4 Nov 1996 18:08:45 +0000
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by ruebert.ieee.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id =
LAA16015
for emc-pstc-list; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 11:46:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Tony Fredriksson <[email protected]>
To: PSTC <[email protected]>, Judd Stewart <[email protected]=
m>
Subject: RE: FCC Class A data vs. EN5502
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 96 08:38:00 PST
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Encoding: 46 TEXT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Tony Fredriksson <[email protected]>
X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients <[email protected]>
X-Listname: emc-pstc
X-List-Description: Product Safety Tech. Committee, EMC Society
X-Info: Help requests to [email protected]
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to [email protected]
X-Moderator-Address: [email protected]
