Scott,

About 99% of fax machines and chips produced after 1990 have CNG. 
Rockwell supplied 96% of fax chips since then.  They still have about 90%
of the market.  Prior to 1990 Rockwell supplied about 99% of the fax
modules and very few had CNG.  I don't know the exact numbers.  It is
difficult to get exact numbers.  I have been assuming 100% with CNG for
the last 5 years.  The main problem is a fax sent manually.  Most machines
allow manual operation and CNG is not sent in this mode.  Call Diverters
have a problem with manually sent fax.  The other problem is old fax 
machines are not replaced until they break or there's a need for plain 
paper.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Duane Marcroft
Telecom Consultant

On Tue, 19 Nov 1996, Scott Roleson wrote:

> 
> Hello TREG'ers,
> 
> I'm trying to get a handle on the number of FAX machines that do not generate
> the 1100 Hz calling tone.  Can anyone enlighten me or vector me to a resource?
> 
> Calling tone is the method used by most FAX/telephone switches to detect if
> an incoming call is a FAX call or a voice call, but some FAX machines don't
> produce them, in part because the T.30 standard doesn't (or didn't) require
> this tone.  I believe there was an effort to make this a requirement, but
> I'm not sure if this came to be or not.
> 
> I've heard anecdotally that about 5% of the existing FAX machines today do
> not produce calling tone, but I have no way to confirm this number.
> 
> Any info?
> 
>   -- Scott Roleson
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Scott Roleson, PE              |   Internet: [email protected]
>  EMC & Telecom Engineer         |     http://www.WP.com/SRoleson
>  San Diego Division  MS 8-60    |   Telephone: +1-619-655-4809
>  Hewlett-Packard Company        |   FAX:       +1-619-655-5931
>  16399 W. Bernardo Drive        |   Amateur Radio:  KC7CJ
>  San Diego, CA  92127-1899  USA |   Any opinions are my own, not HP's.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to