I thought that the treaty of Rome stated that member states
of the EU would adopt into their national laws the directives.
The CE marking directive and the amending directive would
require a CE marking to indicate compliance.

I guess I disagree that selling within one member state
would allow a manufacturer not to use the CE marking.

Isn;t the whole idea of the EU having all member states
adopting laws that are consistent?  If one country allowed
manufacturers within their member state to sell products
in that state that were different from products from other
states, would that not defeat the purpose of the treaty
of Rome???

My advice in the end would be to test the product to
the applicable directives and use the CE marking.

Cynthia

email [email protected]





        treg @ world.std.com 
        08/05/97 03:40 PM
To: treg <treg @ world.std.com> @ SMTP
cc:  
Subject: CE

Hi,
     CE mark was at one time a requirement to cross national borders in the 
EU.  A manufacturer of a product destined only for his domestic market
would only have to comply with his domestic standards.  This would I'm
sure equate to part way for a CE mark.  Warning labels in only one
language and all that.  So so simple.

             Regards Ian
             [email protected]


  • CE Ian Chapman
    • Re: CE Cynthia Pleach
    • Re: CE GLEIS67

Reply via email to