IMPORTANT - CORRECTION/UPDATE RE EMC GUIDELINES Please accept my sincere apologies for unintentionally misleading readers of s.e.e.c, EMC-PSTC, and TREG by my previous announcement, which repeated precisely information received via our trade association from the UK Department of Trade and Industry, but which was incorrect.
Unfortunately, I did not check the URLs myself at the time, but in view of the apparently authentic source of the information, passed it on verbatim. Mea culpa! In article <[email protected]> [email protected] "Alan Hudson" wrote: > Far as I can see (on the radiocom site, plus the EMC Journal site, et > al) the annexes are missing. In fact, every time I've ever seen the > guidelines on the web, the annexes are missing. Obviously nobody can be > bothered converting them into html (or even .doc) format! > > Tried the UK's FEI site, but no sign of the new guidelines there. > > The new guidelines seem to be a significant improvement on the old ones, > and they've expanded significantly on the "system"/"installation" > definitions, but not significantly enough for me! I still don't know if > equipment (one-off's) ordered and specified by a Customer, designed and > built by us, then installed at the Customer-specified site, counts as a > system, an installation, or a red herring! Alan is perfectly correct. The full correct URL is: http://www.open.gov.uk/radiocom/33698.doc but this contains only a 264,192 bytes Word 6.0 document with the full text of the Guidelines (60 pages) but NOT the Annexes. I have asked the Radiocom Agency to advise if they do have the annexes somewhere on their web site, and if so will publish the URL. No doubt other friends will also be searching cyberspace for them! The other URL http://www.tapc.org.uk is currently a private site for the exchange of papers between members of the UK's Terminals Approval Policy Committee and although the home page contains some useful links, if the Guidelines are on this site, there appears to be no way of accessing them. My apologies to all who have posted follow-up messages or emailed me directly. There were so many of you I have felt unable to answer individually, but hope the above will clarify the situation as known to date. Regards to all, and renewed apologies, Bill. -- Bill Lyons - [email protected] / [email protected]
