Rich,

I'm a little confused by one of your points.  You said "...PCs be 
loaded, artificially if necessary, to the point where the input 
current is the maximum rated current at the
nominal rated voltage".

Are you saying that if I rate my PC 100-240Vac, 6A max, I must load it 
to 6A?  What if the power supply is only 100W and can only be loaded 
to an amp or so at 240V?

I would think that a max DC load should be specified by the 
manufacturer and used for this test (as well as input and heating).

Glenn
-----Original Message-----
From:   Rich Nute [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent:   Monday, October 06, 1997 4:11 PM
To:     [email protected]
Cc:     [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject:        Re: Application of EN61000-3-2



Hello from San Diego (y buenas dias de San Diego):


The intent of the EN 61000-3-2 requirement to measure at rated
current is just that:  rated current.

The objective of EN 61000-3-2 is to minimize the effects of
harmonic current on the public network.  To this end, the worst-
case harmonic current emissions is when the load is operating
at maximum current.  Hence, the requirement that testing be
performed at rated current.

For rectifier-capacitor loads such as linear or switching
electronic power supplies, worst-case harmonic emissions occurs
at maximum dc load at the output of the power supply.

It was the intent of the authors of IEC 1000-3-2 that products
such as PCs be loaded, artificially if necessary, to the point
where the input current is the maximum rated current at the
nominal rated voltage.

When I measure a product for harmonic current emissions, I measure
the power supply by itself with an electronic load set such that
the input current is the maximum rated input current.

In practice, one need not measure harmonic currents.  If the power
supply is a linear or switcher rated more than 75 watts, then it
fails -- unless it is a switcher with a PFC front-end.  If it is
less than 75 watts, then it is acceptable. (Even though there are
limits for 75 watts and less, the limits are so high that it is
not possible for the emissions to exceed the limits.)

(I grant that there may be some exceptions to the above rules-
of-thumb, but they are relatively rare and unusual.)

For example, we have a 220-watt power supply operating in an
application where the maximum rated input is less than 75 watts.
Therefore, it does not need a PFC front-end.  (The power supply
is common to other products which are sold outside the EU and
do not need the PFC.)


Best regards (y saludos),
Rich



-------------------------------------------------------------
 Richard Nute                             Quality Department
 Hewlett-Packard Company           Product Regulations Group
 San Diego Division (SDD)          Tel   :      619 655 3329
 16399 West Bernardo Drive         FAX   :      619 655 4979
 San Diego, California 92127       e-mail:  [email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------



Reply via email to