From: "Patterson, Gordon" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from ["Fi
Filiz,
Both FCC Part 68 and Industry Canada CS-03, issue 8, have encoded analog
content requirements for T-1 interfaces.
Regards,
Gordon Patterson
Racal-Datacom
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon D Curtis [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 1998 10:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member
submission from ["Filiz Eryilmaz" <[email protected]>] (fwd)
From: "Filiz Eryilmaz" <[email protected]>
Subject: Central Site Homologation
Hi Treggers,
I have a question concerning Central Site Homologation:
If a company wishes to manufacture and sell a Central Site modem
rack
internationally, what technical requirements beyond the digital
specific
interface (T1 or E1, a-law or u-law) requirements must he meet?
Not
withstanding safety and emission requirements are there any
country
modem-specific operational requirements for such central site
modem rack
products?
Specifically, the bits present at the digital interface to the
product represent an analog signal to be reproduced elsewhere in
the
network. Are there requirements or limits on the bit patterns
that the modem
rack puts into the network based on the fact that these will be
converted to
analog signals and sent over the local loop to the end users'
(AKA "client")
modems?
Where would one find these requirements? The product is
intended for North
America, the European and Asian Pacific markets. Alternatively,
could it be
that any bit pattern is valid and acceptable and the
digital-to-analog
conversion equipment elsewhere in the network is responsible for
scaling
down high-power signals to reasonable limits?
Thank you all.
Filiz Eryilmaz
Lucent Technologies
[email protected]
tel: (732)9576943
fax:(732)9576878
