No Offense to Jon Curtis intended, whose efforts are close to superhuman.
I got to 126 looped messages, did anyone do better ?  

I did warn my constituenct against the use of automated messages and
received one good explanatory reply, that I share below.

Vic



>>> "Victor L. Boersma" <[email protected]> 08/16/98
10:01am >>>

Warning against the use of Automated Responses.

Many people these days make use of facilities in their programmes to
generate automated responses to email messages.

(a) Usually the recipients do not need to know that you are on vacation
but want to see action on the part of your organization.  Therefore, have
someone read your email and respond with useful action.
(Being on vacation is not an accepted excuse for inaction this age).

(b) Many people subscribe to reflector services that are not equipped to
deal  with such messages.   This causes a dangerous and growing
strain on the  Internet.  If you subscribe to any reflector services be
VERY
careful using, or preferably, do not use anything that sends automated 
messages.  They don't help but can hinder. Have  a human interface.

Vic


One response:

Vic this is a recurring problem, not as much caused by people who use
the Email auto-respond feature, but by ill-advised MIS groups who set up
the return for a reflected msg to be the Reflector ID itself. IT SHOULD
NEVER BE THE REFLECTOR ID.  Thus, the auto-respond msg hits the
reflector, send the msg to the whole list (including the auto-responder)
and the endless loop begins.

BECAUSE there are poorly designed MIS Reflectors, people need to be
careful about using auto-responds as your email advises.  You can also
set up screens on in-bound gateways to screen some of these multiple
msgs I believe or use a RULE in your Email program to treat the symptom
of the MIS Luddite, but that does not treat the root cause.

Many MIS systems screen multiple hop msgs and other types of junk mail
on the NET.

PS As one who works multiple time zones and strange hours, all the
time, I agree with your VACATION comment.

Reply via email to