Dude, don't get bent out of shape.  My point was that $10/day is way
more expensive for Internet access than most any other solution, and
generally inferior to other options, too.

Even travelling 4 days a month (I used to travel twice that at least)
means you're spending $40 per month on hotel Wi-Fi -- you can get
cellular access for that (if not less) and not have to worry about
setting it up each time you check in, searching for good access spots,
etc.  $10 a day for hotel Wi-Fi is "brainless" for a business
traveller because it's neither the most cost-effective nor easiest
solution to the problem.

My "personal standards" notwithstanding, spending $10 on something
that should cost a fraction of that, and multiplied times thousands or
millions, is the principal behind why many companies go out of
business.

And yes, despite my addressing you as "dude," I am a seasoned business
traveller and long-time technology advocate, so I know of what I
speak.
- Craig


On 19 May 2006 21:10:00 -0600, Bob Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My time is worth more than $10/day. My company thinks so, too.  Don't use your personal standards to judge others.
>
> Brainless business traveler
>
> Sent from TREO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Craig Froehle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, May 18, 2006 6:07 am
> Subject: Re: [Treo] Re: Response from Sprint about the Treo 700p
>
> (how some hotels still manage to charge >$10/day for Wi-Fi
> is beyond me...I guess it's just all the brainless business travelers
> who think, "whatever...I'll get reimbursed."
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
http://www.GearBits.com -- Tech. Culture. Ideas. Opinions.


SPONSORED LINKS
Palm os Handspring treo Palm os bible software
Palm os program Palm os software Palm os bible


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to