I have a 680 and an 8GB A-DATA "super" card and ran a couple of tests.
The first column is with the default formatting and stuff still on the
card (not really a fair test). Column 2 is 32k clusters, column 3 is 16k,
column 4 is 8k, column 5 is 4k. The default if 4k so it looks like
formatting the card helps clean out the crud:
Default 32KB 16KB 8KB 4KB
File Create: 69% 109% 484% 253% 227%
File Delete: 69% 462% 128% 104% 181%
File Write: 16% 22% 20% 18% 18%
File Read: 682% 682% 692% 653% 644%
File Seek: 1685% 1966% 1685% 1475% 1180%
DB Export: 56% 70% 103% 64% 54%
DB Import: 395% 416% 428% 412% 393%
Record Access: 804% 905% 905% 861% 862%
Resource Access: 914% 914% 800% 834% 768%
VFSMark: 521 616 582 519 481
I also noticed that if I re-ran the test without reformatting the card the
results would drop. For example, a re-run with 32KB clusters gave a
VFSMark of 573.
For the hell of it I compared my 2GB, Ultra brand, 150x SD card and came
up with a VFSMark of 869, though most of that was due to screaming creates
(1561%) and deletes (1387%). Writes were only 11% and everything else was
on par with the 8GB card.
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Roger Prokic wrote:
> Here is my results... Can I get others that have a Treo 680 and an 8GB card
> to post their results?
>
> VFSMark Results Treo 680 TOPRAM 8GB SDHC
>
> File Create: 38%
> File Delete: 12%
> File Write: 14%
> File Read: 635%
> File Seek: 1475%
> DB Export: 8%
> DB Import: 345%
> Record Access: 841%
> Resource Access: 783%
>
> VFSMark: 461
>
> ---
> Roger Prokic
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *NEW*
> Moderator for the Palm_Treo_680 Yahoo Group
> Baltimore, Maryland USA
>
> -=[ This email was sent from a Palm Treo 680 palm computer using
> SnapperMail Enterprise Edition v2.3.7.01 ]=-
>
> _
> ( ) The ASCII ribbon campaign
> X against HTML e-mail
> / \
>
>
--
-Jason
-----
--- There are no absolute statements. I'm very probably wrong. ---
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
- Albert Einstein
